![]() ![]() In addition to the terms “sex” and “gender”, the teaching toolkit makes frequent use of a third term, “gender/sex”. ![]() These data refer to COVID-19 among people categorized as female and male, or woman and man, and the nuances of their sex-linked biology and gender identities are not known. ![]() The toolkit discusses public health data that categorizes people as “female” or “male”, or “woman” and “man.” In presenting this material, it will be important to clarify terminology for your students and make clear that analyses of data collected in this manner do not appropriately capture COVID-19 outcomes for trans, intersex and non-binary individuals. Language Guide Talking about Sex, Gender, and Gender/Sex The breakout activity slides are clearly flagged: instructors are encouraged to select the breakout activities that best suit the needs of their students or the structure of their course. This structure encourages critical thinking about the interpretation of scientific data and social categories. The toolkit also suggests a number of small-group breakout activities to promote active learning and participation. Once the introduction is covered, instructors can choose to focus on any of the three self-contained units without losing internal consistency. The introduction should always be covered in class. The slide presentation consists of an introduction and three self-contained units (Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3) that can be taught together or independently of each other. The toolkit has been designed to allow for adaptation to different classroom contexts and is written for introductory and interdisciplinary audiences across the humanities, social sciences, and sciences. This toolkit emphasizes that evidence from prior infectious disease epidemics, including closely-related coronaviruses, demonstrates that gendered factors such as occupation, lifestyle, and comorbidities, along with interacting social variables such as racism and socioeconomic class are likely the primary contributors to apparent sex disparities in COVID-19. Discussions of sex disparities in COVID-19 outcomes often emphasize biological factors, even suggesting that differential treatment avenues or vaccine regimes for individuals of different sexes should be pursued. By the same token, decontextualized statistics about sex differences in cases and deaths from COVID-19 can reinforce biological sex-essentialist stereotypes.īoth biological and social factors, and interactions between the two, may play a role in shaping the observed patterns of COVID-19 outcomes. Why teach about sex disparities in COVID-19 outcomes through a critical lens?Ī focus on biological sex may underplay the contribution of gender-related and other social factors to COVID-19 disparities, misdirecting public health efforts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |